Saturday, July 1, 2023

The Flash

 

Gillipedia Official Rating: Slowing down with superhero fatigue


Score: 7/10

Ezra Miller Adjusted Score: 4/10

 

          I always pride myself in separating outside factors and judging a film on its merits; however, there is simply so much noise that led up to The Flash that it was impossible not for it to factor into my viewing experience. This includes the current state of DC and how James Gunn is pressing restart on the universe, and there’s the incredible controversy of star Ezra Miller’s problematic arrests and misbehavior leading up to release. If you want to research more into this yourself, you have the internet at your fingertips. So with all that being said, how was The Flash? Honestly, it’s an entertaining experience. Cameos galore of current and former superheroes fill up yet another multiverse movie. The shine that films like Spider-Man: No Way Home brought with the possibilities of bringing past actors back from dormant franchises has diminishing returns a few years later. Even still, The Flash fully warrants a 7/10 with a great supporting cast of characters, some fun action, and—and this is where I think people refused to give the film its props—an honestly pretty great and funny duo performance by star Ezra Miller.

          We start off quick with Ezra’s Barry Allen trying to keep his protein intake to par with the amount of running his superhero duties require, and that gets interrupted by a hospital on the verge of collapse. Batman’s Alfred calls him into action while explaining how the rest of the Justice League heroes are off elsewhere—and, well, at this rate, won’t ever be back… Ben Affleck’s Batman is chasing down some baddies, leaving some literal cleanup duty to Flash. I saw some articles about the director having to defend the visuals while Flash is in his superspeed mode and how if the audience thought it looked off that it was intentional. Well, that’s for sure some bs. Many aspects of the superspeed look fine, but when we get to a maternity ward with a dozen babies falling stories to their death, boy oh boy are those some ugly babies. Uglier than the unseen Seinfeld baby. Worse than the American Sniper fake baby. These are some creepy extraterrestrial little poopers. But there’s also some really funny ideas implemented on how Flash can save them—like transporting one baby in a microwave only to hear that “Ding!” when Flash saves them and signifies it’s safe to take the baby out the microwave.

I won’t say too much about the different characters that appear, but Affleck is only here for the opening, and he honestly has some super solid fatherly advice to give Barry. They bond over tragic parental stories, and while Bruce Wayne has come to terms on how that grief formed for better and worse who he is today, Barry remains fixated on the idea that his dad doesn’t have to be in jail for falsely being accused of murdering his mom if Barry could simply change one aspect of the past of that formative day. Very similar to say Peter Parker, the nerdy Barry struggles with human interaction, is funny in a very dorky way, and closes himself off to the issues that faces Barry because the issues Flash deals with feel more important. So it doesn’t take much self-convincing for Flash to speed up fast enough to travel into the past. He goes back to the day his mom died, catalyzing the self-referenced butterfly effect, and then when he tries to return to present day, something happens and Barry finds himself back in time by about 12 years.

Needless to say, in this time period, there’s another Barry Allen that grew up significantly differently. And it’s not just Barry that is different, this of course, is a whole new multiverse where characters like Batman exist but are different from what present-day Barry knows. So a couple things to discuss. One, the way Ezra Miller plays both present and younger Barry is so much fun to watch, and he truly encapsulates who the character of The Flash is supposed to be. Younger Barry brings plenty of laugh-out-loud moments to this much lighter DC franchise. What we also take for granted is simply how they filmed this. This is not the first time an actor has played multiple characters that appear on-screen at the same time, but this is seamless. Yes, they do themselves favors by having plenty of shots where the two Barry’s are on opposite sides of the frame and don’t cross to make it easy to simply shoot things twice, or they have the backside of one so Ezra can play Barry while looking at a stunt double or a stand-in. And this big budget film also uses plenty of full CGI replacements for the action scenes. But there’s also a lot of quick dialogue and interactions that the two Barry’s have with each other that is executed flawlessly. There is lots of issues with the visuals including the multiverse realm that Flash uses to travel through time that weirdly decides to use CGI for all of the characters and truly looks plastic/claylike. There’s plenty of other rubber-looking movements in small chunks noticeable throughout, but the way they have two Flash characters is a highlight. A couple years back there was a middling Seth Rogen film called An American Pickle that took the two characters-one actor concept to a new level, and this rivals what they achieved there.

Also highlighted heavily in the trailer is Michael Keaton reprising his role as Batman to fulfill the funky multiversal element of this film. There’s easy callouts to his iconic lines, costumes, and gadgets, but there’s also clever Easter eggs too. For example, they convince this older, retired Bruce Wayne to help them find who they think will be Clark Kent/Superman to take care of Zod (the villain from Man of Steel once again played my Michael Shannon). And as Batman glides down through the night, his outline takes the classic bat shape against a full moon background as Danny Elfman’s iconic score plays; even though I’m tiring from multiverse movies and bringing back older actors, I’m not cold-hearted enough not to feel the joy this brings, like thinking back to wearing light-up Velcro sneakers.

Sasha Calle plays Supergirl here, and I would definitely be interested in seeing her in future DC projects. This film is filled with lots of action, some good, some that feels more of the same, CGI action that has dulled the genre over roughly the last 5 years. And part of me is happy to see the integration of so many other superheroes making this like a Justice League Lite kind of film because it allows Flash to shine but doesn’t force his character to carry the film. But it’s impossible to see the other heroes and the cameos of other characters without feeling a little annoyed inside knowing that this could very well be the last time we see some actors portray these characters. There’s even the thought of what could’ve been if Cyborg could’ve been in the film if not for the behind-the-scenes drama between DC executives and the Cyborg star. By the time we reach the end, we haven’t broken ground on new ideas or themes. And unlike how Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 put bows on its characters so well knowing that this was their last adventure as a crew, you get nothing of the sort here. It’s like taking a shot of ranch after eating a decent dinner. The bad ick of too much stays with you, and there’s no dessert to look forward to, leaving ranch dripping down the side of your lips. I really believe this film received the mixed reception that it did because people didn’t separate art and artist and were determined to hate on this film no matter what. The state of DC, the visuals, and not finishing the story are all valid issues of The Flash. But if you want some fun callbacks to DC of days ago and a light superhero film bolstered by the very funny Ezra Miller pulling double duty, this is still an entertaining film and actually one of the better DC installments. Flash was one of my favorite heroes growing up, and coming from that somewhat biased perspective, I left happy that this movie entertained me.

Wednesday, June 7, 2023

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse


Gillipedia Official Rating: Can’t speak for this film in the other versions of the Gillverse


Score: 10/10

          I am in awe of this film. Genuinely, I would describe this as the most beautifully animated film I have ever seen. There is so much the first film did incredibly well, and this film cranked up its ambitions and succeeds on every single level. I will describe in spoiler-free detail all the aspects that I enjoyed as well as my justification for giving it a 10, but take this first paragraph to understand that I want you to see this film in theaters to fully appreciate its achievement as a medium of art.

          When Into the Spider-Verse came out, Sony was still trying to salvage its own Spidey brand while everyone felt like we’ve had enough iterations over the last two decades. But then the film came out and showed just how beautiful you can make an animated film while respecting the look of the comics, AND it kept Spidey’s signature brand of humor and a heartfelt story to boot along with an incredibly colorful cast of characters. With Phil Lord and Christopher Miller (The Lego Movie and Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs both being two of my other favorite animated films) in writing and producing capacities for both of these films, the quality of these films don’t come as a surprise; however, after the booming success of the first film, there’s nothing to hide behind for this sequel.

          The first film was already a bit revolutionary in how it combined the modern techniques and programs used for what we now consider the “Disney” or “Pixar” look of animated films while messing around with hand animation, framerates, and other aspects that go beyond my comprehension for its unique style and look. For Across the Spider-Verse, they go all out in showcasing how much they want the art and animation to be another storyteller in addition to the dialogue. Remember, this is a superhero film where these Spiders all have masks that they wear frequently, and the expressiveness that is conveyed just by lines under the eyes, widening and narrowing pupils, lingering stares, or other filmmaking techniques is so much fun.

          Outside of essentially a recap of the first film, the opening of this movie is dedicated to showing Gwen Stacy’s/Spider-Woman’s (voiced by the unbelievably impressive Hailee Steinfeld) universe and her family. This opening easily features my favorite art style from the whole film, where backgrounds are draped in blues and pinks and fade away in that watercolor brush stroke style. Not only is it gorgeous where if you paused the film you could -ahem- marvel at its glory, but there’s an emotional scene where Gwen talks with her dad, and how the use of color is used to convey the changing emotions of the scene is nothing short of brilliant. And every universe shown is given its own art style and there’s countless animation styles depicted. It’s staggering the level of detail that goes into every frame of this film, and it is well worth it. Rather than the quotas of Dreamwork’s two films per year and even Pixar now joining with those quantities, it makes me so happy that the studio took the years needed between the two films to craft the final product. Truthfully, I feel like any animated film I watch next will simply feel lazy in comparison to what this film does. And I’m not just talking about it not looking like a beautiful 3D animated film—I mean that there must have been carefully planned out storyboarding because how each shot looks, the decisions of extra pieces of information being shown, or how some shots fade into others feels meticulously and purposefully designed.

          So far this review has focused on the animation and art style—and for good reason. That is a standout of this film. But that in itself does not earn this movie a 10/10. One comparison that comes to mind actually is How to Train Your Dragon 2. That animated sequel I have held for awhile has the best conversation-focused scenes ever in an animated film—non-action scenes that aren’t playing for laughs. Across the Spider-Verse contains incredible action and laugh out loud moments, but there’s also conversations between parents and their kids that feels so authentic and real. Animated films tend to dumb down dialogue to appear kid-friendly, but this film allows the emotions of the characters carry through and allows both kids and adults alike to understand complex emotions and the situations these families deal with.

          I was bopping along to the soundtrack, and almost like how The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly has variations of the same theme song for each of its main characters, the score for this film appropriately changes for every character and universe. It’s truly too long a list to even begin to name here, but the cast is stacked full of talent and they give it their all for this movie. The characters are so varied and interesting, the movie is super funny, and the story carries through with enough depth to stay engaging all the way through this over 2 hour movie. The editing choices, particularly whenever splitting into panes like comics, all work. This movie truly excels on every front.

          With that said, there were still some considerations I had to bring this movie down to a 9:

1)    The ending

2)    The animation being overwhelming

3)    The story isn’t the best ever/contain deep themes of Oscar films

4)    It’s hard to hear the dialogue

Again, no spoilers here, but your best argument to knock this film down a peg is the ending. I had my own initials frustrations, but after discussing with some friends, I agreed with the opinion that there was so much already accomplished during this film that if it continued, the film could start to drag and feel overwhelming. The film lives off its merits and in a lesser film would be a frustrating ending, but its quality warrants what it does. For the second point, I was a little worried. The opening logos glitch out in multiverse style, and there is a lot that happens on the screen throughout the film. To me the choices are all intentional and focused enough that my eyes weren’t wandering, so I loved everything they did with the art direction. And for the third point, the film holds together incredibly well considering the Avengers level of characters that make appearances, and there was never a moment that I felt was lacking with the story. The themes presented aren’t life changing, but not every single film needs to hold such deep themes. For the fourth point, I definitely did miss a couple lines of dialogue, particularly from Daniel Kaluuya and his accent, but unlike Nolan’s Tenet, I never felt like I was missing out on key pieces of information.

     My four points listed above I find to be pretty comprehensive on what people might complain about, but this is also the simple ramblings of Earth-696 Gill. And even if you factor in those four possible critiques, to me, those points don’t detract enough anyways from the feat of filmmaking for this movie. My 10/10 score is not to say this is by definition a “perfect” film; the pedestal it puts itself upon that every film will now have to look up to is enough to warrant this decision. I don’t think it’s even a decision to say this movie deserves the Oscar for Best Animated Film this year. If this movie isn’t nominated for Best Picture, that will be an absolute crime because this is the best movie I’ve seen this year, and I don’t think it’s close.

Saturday, May 13, 2023

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3

 

Gillipedia Official Rating: Don’t know what it says about our society that I’m worried about crying over a raccoon


Score: 8/10

          What a breath of fresh air. Essentially, all of the issues that I’ve had with the last 3-4 Marvel films are non-existent here. I’m a bit surprised how little press there has been surrounding the fact that James Gunn was initially fired from this film for his old tweets, and it wasn’t until the whole Guardians cast came to his defense and attested to his character on and off set that Disney made the surprising (and in my opinion correct) move to rehire him. Possibly even more surprisingly, they basically said, “Let Gunn cook.” And boy did he ever. Vol. 3 isn’t worried about being an MCU film; its only concern is to be the trilogy capper to one of the best Marvel franchises, and it absolutely succeeds. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is an honestly great film.

          Through 2 films and a holiday special, the crew has consisted of Chris Pratt’s Star-Lord, Zoe Saldana’s Gamora, Dave Bautista as Drax the Destroyer, Vin Diesel saying, “I am Groot,” for, well, Groot, and Bradley Cooper voicing Rocket Raccoon as the originals; they also added Mantis, Karen Gillan’s Nebula, a telepathic Russian dog named Cosmo, and James Gunn’s brother Sean as Kraglin. There’s been plenty of arcs and great moments through the aforementioned films and specials, plus the more recent events from Endgame. This may not appear too sprawling for a regular MCU fan, but for anyone not familiar, I wouldn’t blame you for thinking that keeping track of all the characters and their storylines feels too daunting. I’m here to say that not only is this a surprisingly accessible film whether you know Marvel or the Guardians at all, but also that Gunn thoroughly impressed me by each character’s arc and how it concludes in this film. This film is full of content, but Gunn manages to keep this film to 2 ½ hours which is starting to feel tame now with some blockbuster films.

          We start off the film by introducing Rocket’s backstory as a test subject of the High Evolutionary (the whole evil genius type, you get it) and a few other animals including a seal, bunny, and otter. And already I’m impressed by the visuals. Just the way Rocket runs across the room is satisfying; we truly get spoiled by an excess of riches when it comes modern visual effects and what we’re able to accomplish, and the visuals are really good and never take you out of the story. We will keep returning to see more of Rocket’s backstory throughout the film, but the plot is kicked into gear when in present day the crew is settled into their headquarters on Knowhere when Will Poulter’s Adam Warlock blazes in, wreaks some havoc, and escapes, but not before mortally wounding Rocket. This drives the Guardians to frantically journey on a fetch quest to gather what they need to save Rocket before he dies. It’s not a crazy plot, and there’s not any real twists or turns to expect which contributes to this film only receiving an 8, but it’s enough to create a juxtaposition between present day and Rocket’s backstory, and allows more time for the whole cast to thrive.

          Per usual, I do want to put the PSA out here that I’ll avoid any more plot points so everything else can remain a surprise for anyone looking to watch the film. What I will once again say is that each character has their own inner conflict they’re working through (Star-Lord in love with the old, dead Gamora instead of the alternate timeline Gamora that has teamed up with Sylvester Stallone’s Ravagers crew, Nebula trying to embrace the idea that connecting with others feels good, Drax still acting as protector/destroyer because without his daughter he has lost any other sense of purpose, etc), and Gunn brilliantly concludes their arcs by the end—whether that is through somewhat hammy and heavy-handed dialogue or genuinely emotional unspoken moments. And all of this is balanced through the signature Gunn/Guardians ultra-fun style, an impressive villain in the High Evolutionary, and a killer soundtrack.

          I have to take more time to gush on Gunn because if he brings his craft to DC, then Marvel will have some serious competition over the next decade. This is easily one of the funniest Marvel films of recent memory, and it also fits the whole tone of this franchise rather than the MCU trying to force every franchise to “be funny.” There's even lines that basically rehash a character's history that work well as joke lines, but they also succeed in catching up newcomers to the franchise. But it’s not just the writing and the colorful cast, it’s that Vol. 3 feels like a carefully constructed film that received the love it needed from every area. The visuals are top-notch, there’s an insane amount of makeup, costumes, and set design, the score and soundtrack are terrific, and Gunn took the necessary time to actually direct this film. Yes, there's some very obvious dialogue that does what it needs to bring its point across, but there's also lots of character moments that are introduced and come back into play without the use of dialogue. Without spoiling anything, the way they're able to show emotions from Rocket and the other animals is exactly what Disney has been missing from their uncanny valley "live-action" remakes-- Bautista's acting for Drax is also a standout. Outside of Ryan Coogler directing Wakanda Forever, this is the best MCU direction of recent memory, and it’s not even close. Some of the recent films like Waititi’s Love and Thunder or Quantumania felt by and large like we received a whole bunch of green screen with exceptionally bland action scenes. Like plain baked potato bland. Outside of that black and white action scene from Love and Thunder, can you even recall a particular moment? Because I struggle to. As we watch the Marvel logo scroll by at the beginning of the movie with iconic shots of Iron Man walking away from an explosion, Cap throwing his shield, or varying shots from the Avengers films, recently, the MCU has been resting on its laurels. All this to say the cinematography here in Vol. 3 is amazing. You can’t pause the film in the theater, but if you were able to, I think you’d be impressed by just how many shots are artfully crafted—almost like Gunn took a small page out of DC director Zac Snyder’s playbook (say what you will about his films, but you have to admit they’re filled with a bunch of simply “cool” shots). And there is a glorious climactic action scene that is almost like the “one-ers” from the Kingsman films where the camera quickly pans by each character and showcases all their different fighting styles and how dominant they can be when acting as a team. This movie is such a breath of fresh air because I care about the characters and the outcomes, and I stay completely engaged from start to end.

          I did notice 2 specific moments from the latter half of the film where the editing was just a touch off. And I already know it’s a symptom of wanting to cutback on the run time, and it isn’t very noticeable, BUT I NOTICED. Outside of that along with the fact that the story isn’t mind-blowing, I really don’t have any complaints. The villain is great, there’s still a bunch of cameos including a hilarious role from Nathan Fillion, and the movie is simply a load of fun. Although Chris Pratt has been cashing it in the last few years, he returned to form a bit in last year’s Prime show The Terminal List where he briefly interacted with Sean Gunn too, and he’s back to form here as well. Drax was the best part of Vol. 2, and although it was impossible to live up to that performance, he’s still a joy here—especially how his arc completes at the end. Putting Rocket front and center for this film worked surprisingly well, and it just makes me happy that Marvel let Gunn do exactly what he needed to for this film. This summer might be a little light on films and this was easily the Marvel film I was looking forward to the most of recent memory, and it lives up to and surpasses expectations. Truly a rare feat, I think you could ask 3 people and receive 3 different answers on which film from the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy is the best. What about me? I’m not ready to answer that yet and need to go back to the first 2 for a rewatch, but for now, just trust me when I say this film is worth it in theaters.

Wednesday, April 5, 2023

Babylon + Far Too Late Oscars' Thoughts

 

Gillipedia Official Rating: A $100 million dollar review


Score: 8/10

          Despite 3 Oscar nominations, Babylon was the butt of many jokes for absolutely bombing at the box office with middling critic reviews. After the desperate persistence from a friend, I finally relented and sat down for 3 hours to watch Damien Chazelle’s latest film. And I’m so glad I did. I only watched after the Oscars were already over, and it made me frustrated for the lack of love this film was shown. There’s a whole lot of everything going on, but it’s extremely entertaining and takes chances. This is Singin’ in the Rain meets The Wolf of Wall Street.

          First, we have to address the shitting elephant in the room. Of all the insane hysteria from the first 30 minutes of this film, Dumbo’s brown release is what I would cut out first. Number 2 is not the only number we witness either. This opening behemoth was largely what the poster and trailers focused on—the house party of a Hollywood elite where all sorts of antics involving human bodies and drugs tirelessly perform through the night. It’s like the climax of Eyes Wide Shut with again, the energy of The Wolf of Wall Street. I wouldn’t be surprised if this level of vulgarity caused what few moviegoers there were to walk out; I don’t want to undercut that it’s a lot. But in the same breath, it’s also not tasteless. The excess in crassness, scenery, and costumes sets up the wild difference of stars on the screen versus their escapism and nepotistic pursuits without the film rolling. And it’s shot meticulously well. I was in awe of how much happens within the lens, and how Chazelle perfectly guides the viewer’s eye. He sets your focus on a single character when he wants you to slow down, and he zooms out to allow you to envelop the whole room with your gaze in total command; there’s sweeping shots of the party and closeups of trumpet players because you can’t have a Chazelle film if he’s not highlighting the jazz. There’s a lot of surprising nuance to hook us through the story’s narrative, but it’s also a great introduction to our 3 main players. The free-spirited Margot Robbie doing precisely whatever she wants while still holding hope that one role can break her through; but until then, she will blow you away with her moves in her small red dress. Brad Pitt oversees more of the operation—the biggest, and most expensive, name around, and he knows his influence. His morals and own lifestyle is nothing to uphold, but there’s still heart and compassion enough to make us root for his character. And the unsung hero is Manny, played by Diego Calva. He will do anything and everything required of his employer if it means the slightest chance of seeing the wonders of a movie set in person.

          After we hit the title card 30 minutes in, the next 20 minutes are a work of art and is the best editing from any film last year. We now follow the next day on an outdoor movie set with many projects concurrently taking place. Manny has found the favor of Pitt and runs whatever errands. When the last camera on set breaks, Manny speeds into town in search of a replacement before the day’s end. Robbie has gained the role of a seductive girl in a bar, and she showcases an uncanny ability to act whatever the director could possibly dream of for the perfect shot. And Pitt calls in favors to renegotiate budgets while prepping for his own leading role—despite non-stop alcohol consumption. And the way things break on set, fires start, and the unwavering pace juggles our 3 leads among the larger set of this entire production is gorgeous, frenetic, funny, and completely captivating. An hour passes, but you’re riding the adrenaline high right alongside the film.

          And it’s only after these 2 massive scenes that we settle into the larger narrative of Manny working his way up Hollywood, Robbie blossoming into the next big star, and Pitt trying to keep up with a world on the cusp of switching over to talking pictures. Starting to once again sound like Singin’ in the Rain? There’s a great homage as Robbie works a scene for a new talking picture, and every take gets squandered by actors missing marks, the new audio equipment not working, the crew interrupting, etc. And it’s hilarious. Chazelle brings some of the incredible insults from Whiplash here in a more comedic setting. Truly, this had me laughing harder than the entirety of far too many comedies I watched last year. But what I thought would be left as an homage became straight up Singin’ in the Rain… No, like, they literally perform that song later in the film.

          So for a 3 hour movie, is everything in there totally necessary? And the answer is no. But not by as large a margin as people may think. Really, from the first 30 minutes, I’d only cut out the elephant mudslide. There’s also one or two side characters that could either have reduced or completely eliminated roles without sacrificing the intention. There’s a tamer party that happens roughly in the middle of the film that ends with Robbie getting bit by a venomous snake. And this scene is the least successful with minimal story elements, the comedy feeling a bit drained, and no true compelling reason to leave it in except to balloon the runtime. Removing a bulk of that scene maybe shaves 15 minutes for you. Otherwise, I’m happy with the result. There’s even a late cameo from one of the producers of the film that is sure to get a reaction from audiences. It’s tonally out of the blue with the best spoiler-free comparison being that of Pulp Fiction. But even this scene is a great change of pace from the rest of the film and cements where the story is headed.

          I’m not only content but am in agreement that Black Panther: Wakanda Forever deserved the best costume design Oscar over this film, but I am fuming that All Quiet on the Western Front won production design and original score. Real life Hollywood may be a little sick of rewarding Chazelle’s collaborator Justin Hurwitz, but the score not only fits the time period of the film (unlike the winner), it’s just one of the best scores in a film in years. Let me repeat myself: the production design and score are incredible. I would even say the ensemble cast, led by the great unknown star Diego Calva is better than Everything Everywhere All at Once. I wouldn’t dare take Ke Huy Quan’s Oscar win away for best supporting actor, but I’d even give Brad Pitt a nomination. And not only did Margot Robbie deserve an acting nomination, she should’ve won the award. This film was also snubbed of an editing and best picture nomination. Again, this movie is A LOT. And it will drive people away, primarily from the first 30 minutes. But by the end of the film, Chazelle is practically yelling at the audience proclaiming, “See? I make this because I care about the artform of films!” The excess is in every regard of this movie, but from top to bottom, it actually works on almost every level. This doesn’t make it a perfect film, but it is one of the best films to have come out in 2022.

 

Other Oscars Thoughts:

 

I first want to put it out there that I successfully predicted 16 out of the 23 winners. All Quiet on the Western Front won more than needed, I’m overall happy that Everything Everywhere All at Once won big, and there were a few snubs aside from the review above including the absolute snub of The Batman not in the running for best cinematography. Even Jimmy Kimmel impressed my low standards by not holding back a few punches with some jokes. Kimmel didn’t hold punches, but there also wasn’t any slaps to speak of. Marcel the Shell With Shoes On should’ve won best animated feature over Del Toro, and I was happy to see Top Gun: Maverick get some love. Honestly, one of the better Oscars in recent memory!

Sunday, April 2, 2023

John Wick: Chapter 4

 

Gillipedia Official Rating: Yeah


Score: 8/10

          The fourth and possibly final installment in one of my favorite action franchises doubles down on everything. As a result more than even the heights of Chapter 3, this movie feels like it goes over the edge with videogame-like action for mostly better results. I think it’s really weak thematically and embraces cheesy dialogue a bit too much, but the action is thrilling and the cinematography is truly a standout.

          This almost 3-hour movie sees Keanu recovering from his wounds from the previous film, bent on killing all in his way of getting out of this international hitman organization run by the High Table. Keanu lets his co-stars do most of the talking, letting his stares and the occasional, “Yeah,” explain his emotions for him—truly, again, in fashion of a silent videogame protagonist. Heck, the two most impressive sequences are a 20-minute action scene at the Japanese Continental where baddies literally appear wave after wave, then one of the final action scenes has a top-down perspective like an MMORPG.

          Some action beats are longer, showing off all the choreography that Keanu and the stuntmen had to prepare for, and others show off simply cool ideas, like a whole scene dodging cars in a busy roundabout in France. This is mostly set to an electronic beat, but you can also expect a nighttime setting mixed with beautiful neon colors. Take that one scene from Skyfall at the top of that Shanghai building and just multiply that by 5 and that’s the results here. I’ve said this about John Wick films of past, but knowing the director’s stunt background and Keanu’s real preparation truly enhances these scenes where characters have to strategize around ammunition, cover, and each other’s fighting style. What became used incredibly from John Wick 3 that I feel is overused here is the bulletproof suits everyone wears, requiring headshots, or repeated fire to break the other character before going in for a kill—it starts to get a little cumbersome and too much by the end.

          A few characters, including the great inclusion of Rina Sawayama, remarks to Wick how everywhere he goes, death follows… And throughout this film, I was trying to disprove that statement and simply couldn’t. Keanu offers a simple, “I am sorry,” but many friends fall as a direct or indirect result of Wick’s actions. The ultimate goal is to clear his obligation and he always fights with respect for his opponents, but it’s also undeniable the destruction left behind, and I don’t think there was a great resolution here.

          You have heard about Donnie Yen appearing in this movie, and he is absolutely amazing. He plays a blind hitman, reluctantly following Bill Skarsgard’s orders to kill Wick in order to keep his own daughter safe. And where other films will use stuntmen and quick cuts to fool the audience that their star can believably wield a weapon, Yen moves with such impressive agility. And what is truly incredible is how every move he makes makes sense on how an elite hitman would act if they were blind. He crosses path Wick throughout the film, but we all know it’s no spoiler to say that they’re destined to fight each other at the end.

          I think I’d still put Chapter 3 as my favorite in the series, but there’s still plenty to love from this film. It’s very violent with an incredibly high body count, and some of the lines are truly cringe, but Keanu, Yen, Sawayama, and Hiroyuki Sanada (playing Wick’s friend and Sawayama’s father) all fight with distinct styles, and every single one of them is a joy to watch. I genuinely would consider this film for a Best Cinematography nomination too. The studio is considering another film after the great box office returns so far, but I’d be perfectly happy with simply spinoffs focused on other characters. This series has been one of my favorites of recent memory, but that doesn’t mean another film is a necessity. Also, Lance Reddick’s character returns here too after an incredible supporting role from the previous film, and it saddens me about his passing, so quick shout out to him. If you’re a fan of any of the previous films, this one is worth the watch in theaters.

Sunday, March 19, 2023

Screaming 6 Times

 

          Having seen the first two films a few years back, I watched all Scream films and then went to see the new Scream 6 that just came out. Yes, these are slasher films with varying degrees of gore. But it’s also the most meta horror franchise that rose to incredible success with the original’s classic surprise twist at the end. The films both follow horror movie “rules” as well as try to put their own spin and keep things fresh to keep their fans guessing. These are my picks on how I’m ranking them all going down worst to best.

 

#6: Scream 3


Score: 5/10

          Two films in the series have a consensus on where they land in their rankings, and I fall in line with those—the first being that Scream 3 is the worst in the series. And I do agree with this assessment; however, considering I had already heard it was the worst, I feel like my score reflects that it’s not terrible, more like it’s simply mediocre. After the OG and a very competent sequel, the studio knew they had to switch up the formula more than before. This meant that our classic Ghostface killer(s) is now targeting the cast of Stab 3, the in-universe movie franchise based on the events from the first films. And where the first two films I’d describe as horror films first with comedy mixed in, I’d flip it here to say the comedy was more of a focus. This is front and center during one of the death scenes that takes place in a studio office and our soon-to-be victim keeps trying to defend herself, but every weapon she grabs is a prop weapon. And to be fair, this really made me laugh and was my favorite scene from the film.

          Scream 3 does a decent enough job of moving the characters’ lives forward, but as far as the main additions destined for their own deaths, character decisions feel more idiotic than before. The jump scares also don’t land. This film clearly has the highest budget of the trilogy, and it’s a prime example of bigger not equating to better. The film leans completely into its Hollywood nature and even includes a couple of cameos that mostly fall flat (the Carrie Fisher one isn’t bad). There’s a big scene that ends in a giant explosion, and it’s just way over-the-top and feels a little removed from the slight sensibility that this franchise stays in the realm of realism.

          They also really stretch the red herrings. The reveal at the end is easily the worst in the franchise, but there is a popular fan theory that would bring this movie from a 5 to a 6, but that doesn’t seem to hold too much weight. Outside of Patrick Dempsey, this is possibly the weakest cast. I’m sorry, but I also have to mention that Courtney Cox’s hair is truly criminal here. And most unfortunately, there’s plenty of jokes about actors being sleazy with producers to get roles… and Harvey Weinstein is a producer. This still isn’t a terrible movie, but it clearly remains the worst.

 

#5: Scream 4


Score: 7/10

          Again, the jump in score here is quite intentional. And I want to mention that the margin between Scream 4 and the next two picks is minimal and I wouldn’t blame people for disagreeing with my order here. After over a decade’s absence, Scream 4 came along as a soft reboot with Neve Campbell’s Sidney Prescott still front and center. Where the first 3 films actually followed Courtney Cox and David Arquette’s relationship surprisingly close to real life including their marriage for 3, the same applies with this film taking place right around when they split.

          The idea of the in-universe Stab movies still hold a strong place, and they keep up with the times by having characters obsessed with the ability to live stream events and how this could possibly connect with Ghostface’s motive. The series returns to the city of Woodsboro where Sidney Prescott is now marketing her book based on the events from the original movie. Couple that with her cousin played by Emma Roberts, and you have a ripe setting for a new series of killings. The great Alison Brie plays Sidney’s manager, David Arquette’s Dewey is now sheriff and has a by-the-books deputy, and Hayden Panettiere rounds out this fun cast. Oh, and Anna Paquin and Kristen Bell play our women at the beginning that receive an unannounced call from Ghostface.

          The reveal at the end is arguably the best outside the original, the film suitably has a more serious tone akin to the first two films while keeping its self-aware nature, and it’s overall a fun return to form. The kills are overall unspectacular, but for the last Scream film to be directed by Wes Craven, it’s too bad in a way that this film wasn’t too successful and once again put things on ice.

 

#4: Scream 6


Score: 7/10

          When it was announced that Neve Campbell wouldn’t return over a pay dispute, that didn’t seem like the best sign when your franchise star is finally out. The only returner here is now Courtney Cox (as well as Roger Jackson continuing to be the voice of Ghostface on the phone). But all successful franchises need to evolve, and it actually goes into a concept I think a lot about. Cox delivers just a few lines of how Sydney and her family have taken shelter, but she also says a very important line about how everyone deserves their happy ending. If we’re truly rooting for our main character to come out on top, at some point you don’t want anymore sequels if it means endangering our hero again. This also provided an opportunity to let Cox shine a bit more as well as turn the spotlight on our returning characters from the fifth installment.

          This might feel like an odd comparison, but some of the best Mission Impossible films have been the most recent that have seen Tom Cruise continue to team up with both characters in the past as well as keeping with writer/director Christopher McQuarrie. Since many of those introductions are already in place, now you get to hone more on the story as well as character arcs. Such is the case here when co-directors Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett took over with Scream 5 since Wes Craven had passed away due to cancer. We continue to follow the high schooler survivors from the previous film as they now cautiously attend college in New York. This helps expand our characters’ lives as well as the sense of scope.

The directors previously made the highly underrated Ready or Not, and they brought the star of that film Samara Weaving to be the girl that receives a call from Ghostface at the beginning of the film. Weaving absolutely kills it, pun slightly intended, and is the case with the previous film, right from the start we’re honoring traditions of the franchise as well as taking things in new directions, and it’s a very strong start. In fact, I enjoyed this opening so much, I’d even say it’s my favorite of the franchise.

          I believe this film has the most deaths, and there’s a suitable amount of gore to fit, but as a very slight spoiler, the vast majority of deaths are from bit roles. The death scenes also don’t quite live up to the amazing kills in 5, but there is a really tense scene that takes place on a New York subway on Halloween. Which makes me wonder why this film received a mid-March release which doesn’t feel like peak horror season, but the box office returns have basically been the strongest in the series, and I’m happy to see it.

          This film features the most frightening Ghostface with the biggest deviation to his look too with a worn looking mask instead of the pristine white look. Ghostface wields a shotgun for one scene, and where you can tell in previous films that Ghostface is able to be kicked and smacked around a bit and let some of the characters escape (at least until the climax), you feel that Ghostface moves with more agility here and truly feels like the biggest threat the characters have ever faced.

          This movie by no means will bring you to tears, but since Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega have taken over as the new stars of the franchise, this movie is actually the most thematic of the bunch. Also, near the end they basically rip off Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, and I’m not upset by that. Honestly, despite the most kills here, again minor spoiler, but there’s a lot of stabbing that happens, but not enough true deaths. Including Hayden Panattiere in this next statement, there should’ve been at least one more returning character to receive a fatal blow (not gonna say here who lives and who doesn’t). I enjoyed this movie a lot and how it honored the series while keeping fans on their toes as to who’s behind the mask. This film is not #4 because it’s bad, but because the films ranked above are truly good horror movies that slightly edges this one out.

 

#3: Scream 2


Score: 7/10

          This might sound a little familiar, but we follow our surviving characters from the original as they navigate life in college. I love that Liev Schreiber returns from his blink and you miss it role as Cotton, where Sydney accused him in the first film of murdering her mom, and now he plays a prominent role here trying to do everything he can publicly to show that he’s an innocent man—but there’s still a sense of uneasiness surrounding him. Sydney, Dewey, and Cox’s Gale Weathers all return, along with Randy too. And this is one of the best casts of the franchise with Jada Pinkett (not yet adding Smith to her last name here) and Omar Epps as our opening scene victims which takes place at a screening of Stab showcasing the fictionalized version of the opening scene from the first film. Gale has a new cameraman, Sydney has a new boyfriend, and Sarah Michelle Gellar and Timothy Olyphant add their names to the cast as possible victims or suspects.

          Despite the fact that there were script changes, I believe even who the killers would end up being, because of script leaks on the internet, I thought Scream 2 did a great job of not just rehashing the original and throwing in some good red herrings. This one felt more like a true horror film rather than the comedic elements, but it of course contains meta dialogue about being a sequel. It doesn’t surpass the original, but there’s a few standout sequences including the suspenseful car crash and a knocked out Ghostface inside the cop car. Honestly, I might be adding some extra points here, but following up on the success of the original was a really tall task, and I’m impressed on how they pulled it off.

 

#2: Scream 5 (technically just Scream 2022)


Score: 8/10

          This was easily the biggest shock for me, but after Scream 4 didn’t perform amazing, there was a TV show that maybe lasted a couple seasons, and Wes Craven passed away, it didn’t seem like there was too much of a point in continuing the franchise. But not only did they bring back the three legacy characters, but they bring in fresh new faces (like Jenna Ortega) in what is self-proclaimed as a requel—a reboot sequel. It’s one of the most meta of the franchise, but I actually found it quite funny how they talked about the rules of a requel and kept the film itself fresh—the easiest comparison to make would be the sequel franchise of Star Wars.

          I’ll hold my claim that Scream 6 has the best opening, but after the original, I’d put this opening as the best. I'll go ahead and say it, I jumped multiple times during the opening scene. But points have to be taken off because it involves Jenna Ortega and she calls The Babadook her favorite horror movie which I simply can’t support.

          Having the connections to Sydney wearing thin, the true new star here is Melissa Barrera who plays Sam—the daughter of the original killer. And they bring back the original killer using to me what appears to be deep fake technology; it actually looks pretty good, but it is still a deep fake. Instead of Sam being a clone of Sydney, her deep fake father (a description I’d like to see used more, I think it sounds funny) speaks to her periodically in her subconscious to have her embrace the serial killer blood inside her. Questioning her own motives, she returns to Woodsboro to protect her sister played by Ortega, and this brings our legacy characters back as well. Jack Quaid of The Boys fame plays Sam’s boyfriend, Dylan Minnete plays the son of Deputy Hicks from the previous film, and there’s plenty more characters (like the niece and nephew of Randy) to add suspicion and body counts.

          Having come out only a year ago, maybe it’s the fact that I just watched all the movies recently, but this being a modern movie just looks really good. The kills are well done scenes, the acting is on par, and this is genuinely just a good movie.

          Cox clearly now also has botox going, and yikes. Not Scream 3 haircut yikes, but it’s still quite noticeable. There’s one too many meta references, and the ending twist isn’t as strong as Scream 4; however, the motivation felt better this time around keeping up with the times in how it has to approach its characters and kills—like characters using find my phone or using their phone flashlights to explore dark rooms.

 

#1: Scream


Score: 8/10

          This isn’t a twist ending selection, and that’s okay! The original is highly regarded for a reason. Directed by Wes Craven, the horror scenes are all really well shot, and this film is elevated above the fatigued slasher genre with its meta references and terrific twist ending. Along with the aforementioned legacy characters, Drew Barrymore is the original opening scene kill and has instantly quotable lines on the phone with Ghostface. Freaking Henry Winkler is here, and it’s hard to live up to Matthew Lillard’s Stu.

          As fond as I am of this movie, an 8/10 is an appropriate score. It’s not a perfect film that lulls a little in the middle. But not only does its dialogue contain references to horror franchises of past—including those directed by Craven—there’s also plenty of visual Easter eggs as well, like the school janitor wearing clothes resembling Freddy from A Nightmare on Elm Street (or the fact that there’s a literal Elm Street in Woodsboro). Our Ghostface is targeting Sydney Prescott, and she’s trying to understand why while also still processing the death of her mother from a year ago.

          Essentially, all these films contain Ghostface killers trying to seek revenge on Sydney for some reason or another, and plenty of characters get the knife by association around her. Then, there’s a highly ill-conceived party during these killings, and that’s where our climax always takes place, and there’s a dramatic reveal of the Ghostface killer(s) as they proceed to monologue their motivation(s). This might feel like a spoiler, but this film came out over 20 year ago, so I feel okay saying that one huge factor that this franchise has over others is that there’s almost always 2 killers. This instantly provides rewatchability as you try to decipher who is the Ghostface at what point during the film. I feel like slashers are oft regarded as some of the lowest form of horror movies, and there’s absolute validity in that statement. Promiscuous and mostly dumb characters party it up and get hacked by a masked killer, there’s lots of blood, and usually no reasoning for it outside of entertainment value. I’m not here to say that the Scream franchise is the crème de la crème of horror movies, but it’s easily the best slasher franchise ever, and I’d even argue that all of the films outside of Scream 3 are good movies regardless of genre. This doesn’t mean this franchise is for everybody, but with 6 films now under its belt, it can be a bloody good time for those looking for some frights and a bit of humor thrown in.

Sunday, March 5, 2023

Elvis, Bad Boys, and The French Dispatch

 

Elvis


Gillipedia Official Rating: Kentucky Fried Tom Hanks

Score: 5/10

          We’ll start this off by saying Austin Powers fully deserves his Oscar nomination for Best Actor. Half of his screen presence is simply smirking toward the camera, but he nails the look, the moves, and most of the singing is his own. Unfortunately, surrounding his performance is a bloated movie edited to death without much to say and suffering a fate of mediocrity. The movie chronicles the entire life of Elvis, but a huge component of the film is an aspect I wasn’t aware of at all which is the wishbone relationship with Elvis’ business manager. Manager Colonel Tom Parker is played by Tom Hanks, and it pains me to say this is where the film’s cracks loom largest.

          We’re introduced to the Colonel on his death bed recounting his time and egotistically defending his actions by propelling Elvis to stardom. And Hanks uses a ridiculous Southern accent. I briefly listened to an interview with the real Colonel, and sure there’s a definite accent, but the way Hanks’ voice is higher-pitched and the accent over-the-top is so grating to listen to. And his supporting role is quite prevalent not only during his scenes, but he also serves as the film’s narrator.

          As the Colonel narrates about success, we’re thrust into a big Elvis performance which feels like it could’ve been shot for a music video. There’s lots of energy, many cuts, closeups of Elvis and his -ahem- sweaty thrusting, and so many shots of screaming young women. So many shots of them… It all works enough to whet the appetite of what’s to come from the greatest selling single artist. We then get a taste of Elvis’ humble beginnings and ties to family and how living around a black community influenced his musical taste. We also are treated to some singing by Gary Clark, Jr. There’s shoutouts to Baton Rouge and Shreveport in Louisiana and the famous Louisiana Hayride show which helped Elvis get discovered. And for over 2 and a half hours, we go through all the typical musical biopic scenes of success, romance, financials, drug use, and thankfully, great songs.

          The Great Gatsby director Baz Luhrmann wrote and directed this film. You may also remember he did the modern adaption of Romeo and Juliet with DiCaprio. And he brings that not-so-subtle directing to this film. It’s incredibly heavy-handed and leaves zero interpretation up to the audience. There’s also not much to sink your teeth into anyways. There’s some intrigue on Elvis’ close relationship to his mother and how the Colonel takes advantage of the gap created once his mother passes away, but that’s one small piece to a very large puzzle that doesn’t fit together all that well.

          The movie wants to tell so much of Elvis’ life, and it also wants to have plenty of musical moments. The issue is that virtually all of it is shot like a music video which becomes exhausting way too quickly. One video I watched recently talked about how lots of editing doesn’t equal good editing. And I think that statement fits Elvis in spades. Outside of the Louisiana Hayride performance that had a buildup of this unknown artist that has an unexpected effect on the young female crowd, there’s really only 1 speed throughout the rest of the performances. There’s so many back and forth shots to Elvis and fans and critics in the crowd, and it’s all just repeated information. When the emotional expression of a character hasn’t changed, the only reason to cut back to them would be intentional repetition. And that is a valid argument to make up to an extent. But when your film balloons to the length that it is, there has to be purpose in your scenes. We go through the motions of Elvis’ life in story beats, but we aren’t presented with overarching goals with the exception of knowing the Colonel is shady but we don’t know how exactly that will come into play.

          I think Elvis has an amazing voice and has some true classics, and to the film’s credit, it does showcase a strong catalogue of songs. There will inevitably be comparisons to Bohemian Rhapsody, and this film honestly didn’t emotionally connect as much as Bohemian Rhapsody. And that is in part due to the Colonel. He is never presented to be a likable character, but I never got over Hanks’ voice. Arguably more sinful than Hanks in this film is the fact that, to my knowledge, there wasn’t a single peanut butter and banana sandwich consumed. One small detail I remember hearing about as well was how Elvis had a mini fridge inside his car, and yes that’s such a tiny thing, but I was really hoping to see that too. Nevertheless, Powers carries the film, and despite the exhausting quick editing, another saving grace is the fact that Elvis does in fact have really good songs. But would I say this movie is worthy of being called a Best Picture Nominee? Mmmm, I don’t think so.

 

Bad Boys


Gillipedia Official Rating: Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? Possibly stop watching before you reach the credits.

Score: 4/10

 

          This turned out to be Michael Bay’s feature film directorial debut, and it really set the tone of what to expect from future films of his (explosions, scantily clad women, and sweeping camera shots) mostly for the worse. I wish there was a baked in word to describe how I feel about Bad Boys, but the only thing I can think of right now is that it’s not good. In fact, it’s very not good.

          There have been plenty of buddy cop films played to more dramatic and comedic effects with varying degrees of success. First example of it done well that comes to mind is Jake Gylenhaal and Michael Pena bantering back and forth but taking a more dramatic turn in End of Watch. And it pains me to say this, but Martin Lawrence and Will Smith annoyed me more than anything—it was just them constantly yelling at each other about the same stupid stuff.

          And this tone is set from the first scene. Our protagonists are driving in Will Smith’s expensive car and give us some exposition about Lawrence having a family and Smith being more of the womanizer and being able to afford the car because of his wealthy family. And it’s not like my ribs are hurting, but I’m not so stiff to say there isn’t at least a joke or two that will make you laugh. They pull over and get distracted by a hooker walking in front of them. While they’re distracted, some drug dealer henchmen hold them at gunpoint. And while I understand this is supposed to be a comedic movie, the action frustrated me. Because there’s legitimate situations where it feels like wow, this seems to be like quite the pickle; I wonder what clever way our characters will think of to get out of the situation… Not only are the situations not clever, the script never knew how to fully get the characters out either, so oftentimes it’s just our guys -ahem- our boys pulling their guns, start shooting, maybe get a guy, and then hiding for cover as bad guys aim at explodable objects to cause utter chaos.

          While Smith and Lawrence yell at each other, both of them get yelled at by their boss played by the always yelling Joe Pantoliano (Memento and The Matrix) who is always being threatened of being demoted by his supervisor. To be fair, Pantoliano’s best acting trait is his ability to yell. Anyways, a call girl that Smith knew invites her friend played by Tea Leoni to a job at a guy’s house, but the guy gets killed by the big not good drug dealers with Leoni narrowly escaping. And that propels our plot where our heroes try to keep Leoni alive as they try to figure out this mystery of both who killed her friend, but also a possible inside job where their bust of large amounts of cocaine are stolen from the police department.

          There’s lots of stuff that doesn’t make sense in this film, but possibly the biggest question mark here is the whole setup of Leoni, Lawrence, and Smith. Lawrence goes to try to find Leoni on his own, and why is he by himself? Pretty sure when he tells Smith about his plans, Smith says something like, “Nah, I’m good.” Like it’s some really dumb reason to separate the two, but it is critical for one of the biggest gags of the whole film. Leoni only will trust Smith’s character because her friend trusted him, but she never met him, so when Lawrence comes knocking, he quickly pretends to be Smith to gain her trust. So from this point forth, we have Lawrence sometimes doing a really bad Smith impression and the gags that come with the character crossover of living each other’s lives. And again, some of the jokes that come with this are in fact funny, but the setup of everything is just so silly. There’s even a scene where Smith and Lawrence go investigate at a club. First, I don’t remember the logic of why they knew to check it out to begin with. But anyways, they keep Leoni at Smith’s apartment for her protection. And then inexplicably, she gets tired of being in this witness protection, so she just leaves the apartment and then gets caught up in the action at the club. It’s baffling as to the character motivations because it’s all just to serve the purpose of oh we need characters to go here and I think it would be funny or cool if this happened. It’s like there’s lots of dots the film wanted to hit and didn’t care how it connected them.

          Michael Bay has had some really cool action moments throughout his career. Early on, The Rock was a cool hit, I was thoroughly impressed by 13 Hours, and even 6 Underground and Ambulance have their moments. But before he got there, he first did Bad Boys. I like that there’s some practical stuff, but it’s impossible to follow closely to what’s happening—there’s simply too main shaky cam shots and extreme closeups of characters yelling stuff like, “Shoot! Shoot!”

          Ultimately, the jokes are too crass, the characters are non-sensical in what they say and do, and the action doesn’t hold up decades later. It’s one of those films that you may feel cool for being able to say you’ve seen if you’re in like middle school, but it won’t impress many others. I haven’t seen the third film, but for what it’s worth, the sequel is marginally better.

 

The French Dispatch


Gillipedia Official Rating: Quirkier than your middle toe. Don’t ask, I don’t know what I mean by that either, but I stand behind it.

Score: 9/10

 

          The Royal Tenenbaums and The Grand Budapest Hotel may reign supreme for Wes Anderson films, but The French Dispatch makes it case for excellency. This unfortunately was a film released in 2021 when people still weren’t really back in theaters, and there was so little marketing that hardly anyone watched this movie. Which is such a shame because it’s an absolute master class. The directing is top-notch, this is one of Anderson’s best written films, and there is his signature, symmetrical, and monochromatic color schemes in spades.

          The French Dispatch is a newspaper reporting on French news but is run and edited in the States by Bill Murray. Upon his character’s death, the rest of the staff releases one final issue, and the film is split into four parts for the different sections of the paper. These are self-contained stories with the only overlap being that the journalists of the titular paper are reporting on the events happening. And each story is absolutely star-studded too. Again, this movie did not make its money back, but boy is it beautiful to look at and stuffed with name after name of Anderson usuals and big names alike.

 

The Cycling Reporter

          This is the shortest segment featuring Owen Wilson really setting the stage for what ride you’re in for for the rest of the film. He rides around a small town, sometimes narrating, sometimes talking directly to the camera. We’re shown how the town looked in the past versus changes to it now, and it’s some of the first instances of The French Dispatch’s quirks of storytelling as well as the mesmerizing way Anderson shoots every shot. Where the first film in this review is shot to death, and in Bad Boys there’s sometimes little thought to the composition of a shot, it feels like there’s purpose in every frame, every set decoration, costume, and where each character—whether main or extra—is placed. We’re also treated to a fantastic score by Alexandre Desplat.

 

The Concrete Masterpiece

          This might be my favorite segment. It’s also where the movie earns its R rating. Lea Seydoux poses nude for art in multiple scenes. Not only is it never shot in a sexual or exploitative nature, it fits perfectly in Anderson’s quirky world where it mocks abstract artwork that is sold for exuberant prices because a few elites tell people it’s worth that much.

          Adrien Brody is so enamored by Benicio Del Toro’s artistic ability that he commissions him to work on a new series. So influential, Del Toro’s work is discussed in like a seminar hosted by Tilda Swinton—an actress born for director Anderson’s quirky style. There’s narration in place in every story by the journalists, and Swinton is that narrator here. We soon become aware that not only is Seydoux acting as Del Toro’s muse, but she is also his prison guard. When Brody first arrives to discuss his plans with Del Toro, there are quick exchanges among the characters; however, the majority of the narrative and humor is driven by the eyes. It’s incredible how much story and humor is told here and throughout the movie simply with body movement. What Anderson does incredibly well with his intricately designed sets is know where to place movement. There’s always plenty of symmetry in how he frames a shot, so he directs the audience’s attention by only having a small section of the frame moving at a time. In the case of this particular scene, it’s mostly just Brody, Seydoux, and Del Toro, so there’s lots of closeup shots with the story told through the eyes—the way Del Toro looks over to Seydoux and she subtly nods or blinks her approval for him to move forward with any deal.

          From there, Anderson satirizes the way some art is given value over others, and the big opening once the pieces are done is a highlight scene.

 

Revisions of a Manifesto

 

          Frances McDormand is our journalist for this section as she details her influence over disputes between young rebellions and government. She repeatedly and humorously talks about her journalist integrity by staying neutral, and then she proceeds to offer her advise to Timothee Chalamet, the leader of one side. Instead of gory action scene or large rebellions like the one from Les Miserables, it’s more of a battle of wits here, sprinklings of chess playing and manifesto reading. I found it absolutely hilarious the way sides would try skimming sections being referenced in the manifesto by literally mumbling through their readings.

          There’s lots of cameos from great actors here, but I’d argue the combination of McDormand and Chalamet fits Anderson’s style the best in how they interact with each other. The dialogue is quick, the messaging is interesting, and it’s one of the funnier sections of the film. At first I found myself wondering what the real point of this movie was, but as you dive into the meatier sections of the film, you worry less about overall structure and find yourself simply enjoying the mostly self-contained narratives for what they are. There aren’t any clear high or lowlights, and that works to The French Dispatch’s advantage of consistently keeping the audience engaged through this pretty brisk film.

 

The Private Dining Room of the Police Commissioner

 

          Our final segment is by the self-critical Jeffrey Wright—a consistently underrated actor. Placing this section last makes the most sense as it’s the one that also references the relationship among the editor and journalists the most; Wright has a sense of obligation and even pride for Murray giving him a chance to write. And Wright does write which is the right thing to do—dare I say a rite of passage.

          The pacing is also quickest here. There’s a peculiar chef, the commissioner, and a dinner that is interrupted by kidnappers taking the commissioner’s son. This leads to a car chase that turns to an almost cartoon-style 2D animation that still feels completely aligned with Anderson’s vision—he did direct Isle of Dogs and Fantastic Mr. Fox after all. Not to be outdone by the other sections, there’s actors galore here including Saiorse Ronan in a deviously small role. In fact, if you’re using this review to determine how many big actors have roles here, you’re wasting your breath because I probably haven’t even named half of the actors that I recognized in this film.

          This last section I’d argue is the most artistic of them all with the most development in terms of Wright reflecting back on this piece and its influences on himself. I’m someone that enjoys being able to recognize familiar faces in films, and this film has that in spades, in clubs, and more. But if you don’t have an interesting surrounding story, that shine only goes so far. Not only is this a quick film separated into sections each with their own intrigue, but it continues Anderson’s incredible eye for framing and one of the best scores in his films ever. The fact that this film wasn’t nominated for anything like director, production design, editing, or score is absolutely criminal. The French Dispatch was one of the best films of 2021, and it’s a shame I waited this long to watch it and that it was overlooked by so many when it came out.